I read Andy's blog post, "Dialectics: Ignorance and Knowledge", where Andy analyzed the two subjects and weighed their benefits. Here's what I said:
Andy,
Once again you have written a blog post that I could relate to on an intellectual standpoint. I agree with you. To me, Cypher was the only "free" crew member of the Nebuchadnezzar who had any sort of sanity and logic. After experiencing two dynamically different lifestyles, one that was bleak and dangerous, and the other being hopeful and steak-filled, Cypher made the conscious decision to return to the Matrix and live a luxurious, peaceful life. The only criticism I have about his decision is that he endangered the lives of his peers. So overall, I'm on board with Cypher's intentions, and not his plan. I strive for happiness; I have stated before that it is my one and only goal. Therefore, Andy, I believe I would act as you would: to return to the Matrix. However, although happiness is what I strive for, I would hate to give up knowledge and embrace ignorance to achieve that happiness. This is a game of balance, one that both of us will have to deal with in the future. Bravo.
Next, I read Kali's "Dialectics: The Conscious and Unconscious Mind", where Kali defined both mental states to the realities of the Matrix. In response to her words, I said:
Kali,
I'm impressed you delved this deeply into the subject of the conscious and unconscious mind. To me at least, this is a topic which I find quite difficult to articulate with words. I have a few things to say that might mess with your mind a little bit. It is understandable how you associated the real, dark, and sentinel-infested world with the conscious mind and the Matrix with the unconscious one. However, is the Matrix world really unconscious? Literally, millions of human beings are by definition, unconscious, suspended in tanks of pink goo. But on the flip-side, is this unconscious state of mind directly reflected in the Matrix world? Is it safe to assume that these people are living unconsciously? Something about this assumption bugs me. First off, the subjects of the Matrix did not live a restricted, despotically influenced life. Everyone has choices in the Matrix. Let's say that you live in the Matrix, and there is a Subway and a McDonalds in front of you. Aren't you consciously making a decision to choose what you wanted for lunch? I agree with you on the basis that everyone's life within the Matrix is influenced by their unconscious selves outside of the Matrix, but it is interesting to see that in itself, the Matrix is a very conscious world. The Matrix is like a lucid dream: a subconscious extension of the unconscious, where consciousness is possible. Say that three times fast.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Dialectics: Reality and Simulation
"What is 'real'. How do you define 'real'. If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then 'real' is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain... Welcome to the desert of the 'real'." The Matrix's revolutionary leader Morpheus brings this brain convulsing question to mind. At which point does the world around us fail to differentiate the two: Reality and Simulation. When will humanity lose sight of reality and live in a world of simulation, of the unreal? Will our lives ever be the representations of a few lines of code? The fact is, we may never know. Our current reality may be a Matrix, the grandest of all simulations. By definition, the two may seem to be worlds apart, but they are more intertwined than you can ever imagine.
Reality. It's definition comes as a simple answer to most of us. Most would say that something can be categorized as "real" when it can be observed by the senses, and sense can be made out of that something. However, there is more to reality than this simple definition.Take a stroll in a park for example. The wind feels cool against your skin, the grass sways as a result of that wind, the sun casts shadows in the ways that it should, your feet meet the ground firmly by each step you take. Everything in this picture is real. However, there is more to this picture than the observable things like the sun, wind, ground, and grass. Why do we assume that the grass will sway in the wind? Why do we expect our feet to hit the ground, and not fall through it? These ideas, although not necessarily tangible and "observable", they are as real as the wind and the sun. The same goes for the Matrix.
In the frame of the movie, the Matrix exists, does it not? It is an actual world, created by the machines to harvest human energy. Here, people will most likely say, "Woah, hold up, the Matrix is a simulation, not an actual world." And to those people I say, "Shut up, you're wrong." If ideas can be entirely real, what is bound by the definition of real? Why are simulations excluded from this categorization? They shouldn't be. In the Matrix, Neo remembered eating some delectable noodles at some diner. But did Neo actually eat those noodles? Hell yeah he did. Sure he didn't eat those noodles outside of the Matrix, or outside of the simulation, but you would be wrong if you said that Neo did not really eat those noodles at all. He remembered eating them and he remembered how good they were because he stuffed those tasty noodles down his throat in the Matrix. Within the frame of the Matrix, he ate real noodles, and you cannot deny that reality. Therefore, the Matrix is an actual world; it is an extension of reality.
At a glance, the terms Reality and Simulation may seem like antonyms, but they are not. To me, Simulations are merely another Reality. To me, there is no such thing as something that isn't real. Just because something does not exist, it should not be excluded from the all encompassing Reality. Hundreds of years ago, a computer seemed just as laughable as the possibility of a Matrix does now. And yes we may be in an a Matrix at this very moment, it is entirely possible and very real. At first these ideas and concepts blew my brain all over the floor, but since them I've recollected the pieces and accepted this truth. If I'm living in a simulation, it's one hell of a reality.
Reality. It's definition comes as a simple answer to most of us. Most would say that something can be categorized as "real" when it can be observed by the senses, and sense can be made out of that something. However, there is more to reality than this simple definition.Take a stroll in a park for example. The wind feels cool against your skin, the grass sways as a result of that wind, the sun casts shadows in the ways that it should, your feet meet the ground firmly by each step you take. Everything in this picture is real. However, there is more to this picture than the observable things like the sun, wind, ground, and grass. Why do we assume that the grass will sway in the wind? Why do we expect our feet to hit the ground, and not fall through it? These ideas, although not necessarily tangible and "observable", they are as real as the wind and the sun. The same goes for the Matrix.
In the frame of the movie, the Matrix exists, does it not? It is an actual world, created by the machines to harvest human energy. Here, people will most likely say, "Woah, hold up, the Matrix is a simulation, not an actual world." And to those people I say, "Shut up, you're wrong." If ideas can be entirely real, what is bound by the definition of real? Why are simulations excluded from this categorization? They shouldn't be. In the Matrix, Neo remembered eating some delectable noodles at some diner. But did Neo actually eat those noodles? Hell yeah he did. Sure he didn't eat those noodles outside of the Matrix, or outside of the simulation, but you would be wrong if you said that Neo did not really eat those noodles at all. He remembered eating them and he remembered how good they were because he stuffed those tasty noodles down his throat in the Matrix. Within the frame of the Matrix, he ate real noodles, and you cannot deny that reality. Therefore, the Matrix is an actual world; it is an extension of reality.
At a glance, the terms Reality and Simulation may seem like antonyms, but they are not. To me, Simulations are merely another Reality. To me, there is no such thing as something that isn't real. Just because something does not exist, it should not be excluded from the all encompassing Reality. Hundreds of years ago, a computer seemed just as laughable as the possibility of a Matrix does now. And yes we may be in an a Matrix at this very moment, it is entirely possible and very real. At first these ideas and concepts blew my brain all over the floor, but since them I've recollected the pieces and accepted this truth. If I'm living in a simulation, it's one hell of a reality.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)